XP-Gap an NPS Surpassing Metric

Reading time: 5 min

In the world of User Experience (UX) and Customer Experience (CX), measuring success goes beyond simple metrics. How can we really capture the essence of an experience? The classic Net Promoter Score (NPS) has been criticized for its lack of depth and context. So what is the solution? In this article we will develop an alternative that provides a more complete and accurate view of customer satisfaction: the XP Gap.

The importance of expectations

Expectations act as a filter through which we perceive and evaluate our interactions with a brand or product. They are the result of our past experiences, external influences and the promises that the company itself has generated through its marketing and communication.

When expectations are aligned with reality and our experiences exceed what we expected, there is a sense of gratification and satisfaction that goes beyond the simple business transaction. This not only strengthens our emotional connection with the brand but also increases the likelihood that we will recommend their products or services to others. Conversely, if our expectations are not met, either because we expected more or because we are faced with a more disappointing experience than assumed, our perception is likely to be negative. In some cases, we may even feel disappointed or let down. Consequently, it is essential that companies understand and manage their customers' expectations effectively to ensure positive and lasting memories.

Satisfaction survey.

The Disconfirmation of Expectations theory 

The theory of Disconfirmation of Expectations (EDT) developed by Richard Oliver and based on cognitive psychology can help us understand the XP Gap concept.

WBS postulates that customer satisfaction is not determined solely by the objective quality of a product or service but by the discrepancy between prior expectations and the perceived experience. In other words, customer satisfaction is not simply the result of receiving what was expected but is influenced by the difference between what was anticipated and what is actually experienced.

This theory suggests that there are three possible scenarios after an interaction between the customer and the company:

  • ‍Positive feedback: the experience exceeds the customer's expectations, resulting in increased satisfaction and possibly brand loyalty.‍
  • Negative confirmation: the experience does not meet the customer's expectations, which can lead to dissatisfaction and a negative perception of the brand.
  • Neutral confirmation: the experience exactly matches the customer's expectations, which may generate a sense of satisfaction but not necessarily a lasting impression or commitment to the brand.

What is the XP Gap?

The XP-Gap builds on the theory of Disconfirmation of Expectations by measuring the discrepancy between expectations and actual consumer experience. In doing so, it provides a quantitative measure of satisfaction that goes beyond simple positive or negative evaluations. This metric allows companies to better understand how expectations influence customer perception and how they can adjust their strategies to meet and exceed these expectations. The XP-Gap leverages this theory to provide companies with a powerful tool to measure and improve the customer experience at every stage of the customer journey.

The application of the XP-Gap is simple but powerful. After each key customer interaction, the customer is simply asked, "How would you rate the experience?" using a nominal scale that reflects their feelings directly.

In-person survey.

Advantages over Transactional NPS

In the constant search to understand and improve the consumer and/or user experience, companies have resorted to various metrics to evaluate customer satisfaction and loyalty. One of the most widely used metrics has been the Transactional Net Promoter Score (NPS). However, this metric has its limitations. This is where the XP-Gap emerges as a more robust and effective alternative. 

  • ‍Avoidcultural ambiguities: XP-Gap's nominal scale offers a significant advantage by eliminating the need to translate customer sentiments into a universal numerical scale. This is crucial in an increasingly globalized world, where companies serve customers from diverse cultures and regions. By allowing customers to express their feelings directly, without the interference of language or cultural barriers, the XP-Gap provides a clearer and more accurate picture.

  • ‍Basedon actual experience: Unlike Transactional NPS which focuses on hypothetical questions about future recommendations, XP-Gap is based on the client's immediate past experience. This difference is critical, as the answers are anchored in real, tangible events that you have experienced. This allows for more accurate and relevant feedback to the company, as it is based on concrete experiences rather than assumptions about the future.

  • ‍Usingthe XP-Gap as a benchmark: Being a nominal scale, the XP-Gap is analyzed using the mode, i.e., the most repeated category. At Proaxion, we use the "top box" as a measure of high satisfaction, which allows us to quickly identify the aspects of the customer experience that are generating the highest levels of satisfaction. This not only drives referral behaviors but also sets a standard of quality that companies can aspire to consistently meet and exceed.

Area managers and team leaders can benefit greatly from the XP-Gap. This metric not only identifies pain points but also points out opportunities to improve and add value. By adopting this metric they can gain a deeper and more accurate understanding of the customer experience, enabling them to make informed and strategic decisions to continuously improve their service and foster loyalty.

Deepening XP-Gap

Now that we have established a solid foundation for understanding XP-Gap, it is crucial to further explore its application and benefits in different business contexts.

  • ‍Impacton Customer Loyalty: One of the key benefits of XP-Gap is its ability to drive customer loyalty. When the experience significantly exceeds expectations, customers are not only satisfied but also more inclined to remain loyal to the brand and recommend it to others. This translates directly into organic business growth and a positive reputation.

  • ‍Improvement StrategiesBased on the XP-Gap: Using the XP-Gap as a diagnostic tool allows organizations to identify specific areas where the customer experience can be improved. For example, if a particular interaction has a high rate of negative disconfirmation (i.e., expectations are not being met) corrective actions can be implemented to address these weaknesses.

  • ‍Integrationwith Agile Methods and Design Thinking: XP-Gap aligns perfectly with Agile methodologies such as Scrum and Design Thinking. By capturing real-time feedback and acting on it quickly, companies can iterate and continuously improve their products and services to meet changing consumer expectations.

Implementation of the XP Gap

The potential of XP-Gap transcends industry boundaries. From technology companies to financial institutions and service companies, all can benefit from this metric to optimize their processes and strengthen customer relationships.

However, while XP-Gap offers valuable insights, its implementation is not without its challenges. One of these is ensuring accurate and representative data collection. It is critical to establish clear protocols for feedback collection and to ensure active participation by clients.

People reviewing statistical graphs in an office.

In addition, it is important to recognize that XP-Gap is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Each organization has its own specific characteristics and needs, so it is necessary to adapt and customize the approach to suit your business context.

Conclusions and final recommendations

In conclusion, the XP-Gap represents a revolutionary approach to measuring and improving the customer experience. By focusing on expectations and their disconfirmation, this metric provides valuable insights that can drive effective CX and UX strategies. For area managers and team leaders, adopting the XP-Gap as an integral part of their continuous improvement processes is critical to ensuring competitiveness and customer service excellence.

To successfully implement XP-Gap, the following is recommended:

  • Training staff on the importance of customer expectations
  • Integrate XP-Gap into feedback and continuous improvement processes.
  • Use appropriate technological tools to collect and analyze data
  • Establish clear performance metrics based on the XP-Gap results.

In short, XP-Gap is much more than a tool; it is a philosophy that puts the person at the center of all decisions. By adopting this customer-centric approach, organizations can differentiate themselves in a competitive marketplace and achieve higher levels of satisfaction and loyalty. With careful implementation and ongoing commitment, it has the potential to radically transform the way companies interact with their customers and users, delivering exceptional experiences across all touch points.

By
Eduardo Laveglia
Share with your network
Subscribe to our newsletter

Related contents